Synapses in NEST - Overview
This document gives a brief overview over how synapses are currently implemented in NEST. Synapses in NEST come in two parts:
a Connection object that manages synaptic weight and delay, and
code implementing the synaptic currents or conductances resulting from a spike arrival; the latter is always coded in the model neuron class.
Both parts will be discussed in turn. Some of the discussion below is simplified, ignoring issues of parallelization; the intent is to give you the general idea.
Storage of synapses
All targets of a given neuron are stored in a target list containing
Connection object per target. When a spike is sent, NEST
traverses the target list and sends information about the spike, i.e.,
weight, delay and spike time to each receiving neuron.
Some synapses implement spike-time dependent plasticity, i.e., they
modify the synaptic weight stored in the
Connection object based on
the spike history of the receiving neuron. These synapses access the
spike history through special member functions of the receiving neuron
class, which must be derived from
ArchivingNode (most models are).
The details of connection storage infrastructure are explained in Kunkel et al. (2014), Spiking network simulation code for petascale computers. Front. Neuroinform. 8:78. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00078.
When a spike arrives at a neuron by a call to its
SpikeEvent provides information about the synaptic weight,
the spike time, and the delay, so that the actual arrival time of the
spike can be calculated.
It is now entirely up to the neuron class to handle this information. In particular, all dynamics of synaptic currents or conductances must be implemented in the neuron model. See the model development guide for examples of how this is done.
NEST currently does not have any models with voltage-dependent
synapses, such as NMDA channels. A simple way to introduce such a
voltage dependency in, e.g., the
iaf_cond_alpha model would be to
multiply the synaptic conductance
g(t) with a sigmoidal function
m(V) in the expression computing the right-hand side of the membrane
It is a bit unfortunate that one needs to include the code for the synaptic currents/conductances anew in each new neuron model, but for many simpler models this leads to more efficient code than one would obtain if synaptic current dynamics were represented by separate objects. We will consider changing this in the future, though.
Using different receptor ports
Introducing NMDA channels obviously raises the question of how to differentiate input to different types of channels on a neuron, e.g., AMPA, GABA_A, GABA_B, and NMDA channels.
Most NEST models are very simplistic in this respect so far: they differentiate at most between an excitatory and an inhibitory synapse, and all input with positive weight is handled by the excitatory, all with negative weight by the inhibitory synapse.
More channels can be handled using the receptor type/receiver port
mechanism in NEST. Please see
iaf_psc_alpha_multisynapse for examples.
Time is a very important issue when processing spikes. Especially when the effect of a spike on the neuron depends on the history or state of the neuron, it is crucial that one considers causality carefully.
This is the reason why history information about a neuron is available only via the ArchivingNode interface, while state information is currently “exported” only through the UniversalDataLogger interface (under development, available in few neurons today). The paper Morrison et al. (2007) paper has more on spike history handling.
NEST delivers spikes in batches. Simulation proceeds for min_delay (minimum delay) time. During this time, any generated spikes are stored in a central spike queue. After each min_delay interval, spikes are delivered from the central queue via the ConnectionManager and the Connection objects to the individual neurons.
All delays are handled inside the neuron, as described above. This means that when a spike “passes through” the Connection object, the actual biological arrival time (time when spike occured at sender plus delay) of the spike may be up to max_delay (maximum delay) time units in the future. This means, in particular, that Connection objects cannot perform any computations that depend on the state of the neuron at the time of “biological” spike arrival; they can only use historic information.
Another important point is that spikes do NOT pass the Connection object in correct order of biological arrival time—they are unordered in time.